Mission Issues

Thinking and re-thinking missionary issues

Long-term commitments towards mission

This past Sunday, 13 January, it was exactly 23 years since I was ordained as minister of the Swaziland Reformed Church. Actually, I didn’t even think about it until I arrived at the church and saw that someone had put up a notice in the church which read: Happy birthday and happy new year. When trying to find out who’s birthday they were celebrating, nobody seemed to know, although I wondered if they hadn’t intended this to be a celebration of Jesus’ birthday! In any case, I then suddenly realised that in a certain sense it was a birthday celebration – my being part of this church in Swaziland for 23 years.
When I arrived in Swaziland on 4 January 1985, I never thought that I would be remaining there for so long. Typically, at that time. ministers remained in churches for three to four years, before moving on. It was usually just the hopeless cases whom nobody else wanted that remained in one congregation for such a long time 😉
The advantages and disadvantages of remaining in one congregation for a long time can be debated. I know that Rick Warren believes that it is good for a minister / pastor to remain in one congregation more or less for life. I tend to think that this may be even more important in a missionary post. I’ve seen people come and go in missions, sometimes remaining in one place for a year or two and then moving on to the next place. Obviously not all are called by God to do the same thing. Paul also moved around a lot. The problem, when working in a totally different culture from your own, is that it takes so long to build relationships – something which cannot be done in a year or two. When you move away after such a short time, it would be nearly impossible to leave behind something which have really made a change to the people’s lives.
Related to this is the lack of commitment from people going on short-term outreaches. I wrote about this topic a few weeks ago and have been thinking about it again over the past few days. People go on a short-term outreach, get excited about what they experience there and the people they meet, promise te keep contact, promise to send photos and promise to return, and I would dare to say that in 99% of the cases none of these promises are kept.
While I was still a student, I was the leader of a short-term outreach to a small community in rural Kwazulu-Natal (South Africa) where we helped the local minister to add a study / office to his home. His wife was pregnant at the time when we were there. A few months after we left we heard that the baby was born, that it was a son and that they had decided to give the child my own name: Siyabonga SenzoseNkosi Arnau (translated into English this means: We thank the work of the Lord, Arnau) which was a great honour to me. A few months after I made special effort to travel back to that area to greet the family and to see the child. That day I saw how much it meant to those people that I had not forgotten them.
Being involved in mission is a long-term commitment. Those leading outreaches or coordinating a church’s mission program, need to realise this. Although I am convinced that God expects of all of us to have a vision for mission, part of this vision should be based on a long-term commitment in whatever place God calls us to work. More harm is being done by hit-and-run missionaries than by those not involved at all.


Wednesday, January 16, 2008 - Posted by | Africa, Building relations, Celebration, Church, Indigenous church, Mission, Short-term outreaches, Swaziland, Theology


  1. Beautifully said. I think the same can be said for many areas of ministry as well. We live in such a transient society. At least in the West we are almost expected to only spend a certain amount of time on a project and then move on. The days of jobs that would go for twenty years and end with a retirement party and the gold watch are long gone. I think it takes maturity, commitment and a groundedness in the soul to make a commitment as you have and I fear very few in our world today even think this way. Duty, hard work and responsibility are not highly valued today. I’m with you. It takes time to gain trust, make real friendships and invest oneself long enough so that the people would even BEGIN to trust what you say and MAYBE be drawn to you, your belief system and your church.

    Comment by Maya | Thursday, January 17, 2008 | Reply

  2. In my experience churches are often hesitant to make a real commitment to missions or to take RESPONSIBILITY for a missions ministry, leaving missionary projects to the enthusiasm of a few individuals.
    Am I cynical in thinking that many churches and missions committees are either looking for just another feather in the missionary cap or lacking in faith that the Lord will sustain the work with enough financial and human resources in the long run?
    Without long term commitment, short term outreaches very often only serve to fulfill the outreach team’s own need to be usefull in the Kingdom, without making much of a contribution to the spiritual well-being of those recieving the ministry.

    Comment by Piet Steyn | Thursday, January 17, 2008 | Reply

  3. Maya,
    You set my mind thinking with your comment. My father was one of the people who remained at one place (in the steel business) for more than 30 years. I suspect that one of his motivations was the security of a good pension fund. But nevertheless, there was also a lot of loyalty involved – something which is lacking today. As you rightly mentioned, it is nearly expected of people to move on from one project to the other. Sadly, in the church it also means that you start one project, get it going and then move on to the next (better, more exciting) project. Ultimately we end up with a lot of projects that were started and failed, often not because the projects as such were lacking but because of a lack of commitment.

    I think you said it very well that for many churches a short-term commitment may be nothing more than a feather in the missionary cap. What I find to be very sad is that those involved in the missionary task are expected to have great faith that God will provide in all their needs but that those on the “home front” work strictly according to a budget and if there is a lack of funds then the first and easiest place to cut is the mission fund.

    Comment by Arnau van Wyngaard | Thursday, January 17, 2008 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: